<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter vs. SMS vs. Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danrumney.co.uk/2009/02/17/twitter-vs-sms-vs-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danrumney.co.uk/2009/02/17/twitter-vs-sms-vs-facebook/</link>
	<description>Technology from work and home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.danrumney.co.uk/2009/02/17/twitter-vs-sms-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danrumney.co.uk/?p=119#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  I think some people don&#039;t understand what Twitter is and how it is a platform more than a site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  I think some people don&#8217;t understand what Twitter is and how it is a platform more than a site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dancrumb</title>
		<link>http://www.danrumney.co.uk/2009/02/17/twitter-vs-sms-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>dancrumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danrumney.co.uk/?p=119#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to see any stats from Twitter that shows the distribution of clients.

My post speaks &lt;b&gt;specifically&lt;/b&gt; about the intention of Twitter. Most Twitter clients provide automatic notification of updates. Most &#039;blog&#039; clients (i.e. web browsers) do not; you need to make a specific request to a blog to determine its state.

RSS would be an exception. Accessing Twitter and Blogs via RSS feeds put them on an equal footing; I don&#039;t have any stats, but I would think it a safe bet that RSS access is in the minority for most Twitter accesses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see any stats from Twitter that shows the distribution of clients.</p>
<p>My post speaks <b>specifically</b> about the intention of Twitter. Most Twitter clients provide automatic notification of updates. Most &#8216;blog&#8217; clients (i.e. web browsers) do not; you need to make a specific request to a blog to determine its state.</p>
<p>RSS would be an exception. Accessing Twitter and Blogs via RSS feeds put them on an equal footing; I don&#8217;t have any stats, but I would think it a safe bet that RSS access is in the minority for most Twitter accesses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Fad</title>
		<link>http://www.danrumney.co.uk/2009/02/17/twitter-vs-sms-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Fad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danrumney.co.uk/?p=119#comment-28</guid>
		<description>&quot;When they do this they will automatically be made aware of your tweets through the client they are using to connect to Twitter.&quot;

Really?

I only view twits through an RSS feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When they do this they will automatically be made aware of your tweets through the client they are using to connect to Twitter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really?</p>
<p>I only view twits through an RSS feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
